Prepared a detailed non-infringement opinion demonstrating fundamental structural differences between the client’s clamp-style bed sheet holder and the asserted sliding-strip patent. The report was submitted to Amazon and opposing counsel, leading to withdrawal of the complaint and restoration of the ASINs.

Conducted an element-by-element comparison under the “ordinary observer” test, highlighting differences in lens shape, bridge configuration, and temple geometry. The written opinion and annotated exhibits persuaded the patent owner not to pursue further action, and the client’s listings remained active.

Represented a seller in Amazon’s Patent Neutral Evaluation program over a mounting structure for TV protective plates. By preparing a concise but technically detailed non-infringement brief and claim charts, the client showed that its product used a materially different locking mechanism, leading the patent owner to withdraw from the evaluation.

Analyzed a U.S. configuration mark covering a tubular tire-iron-shaped tool and compared it to the client’s hydraulic door closer. The opinion explained why the protected configuration differed in overall appearance, function, and market context, leading Amazon to maintain the client’s listings.

Prepared a design non-infringement report for a travel bag organizer, emphasizing differences in panel layout, pocket configuration, and fastening systems. Using side-by-side visuals and structured “difference points,” the seller successfully appealed and recovered the suspended ASINs.

For a manufacturer planning simultaneous launches on Amazon, Walmart, and Temu, the firm conducted prior-art and patent landscape checks, reviewed competitor patents, and issued non-infringement assessments for key SKUs. The client launched successfully without receiving IP complaints during the initial sales period.